Live Combined Scorecard
What is this?
What is this?
This scorecard comprises all data submitted by our users to generate a combined scorecard.
For this we average out the score for each boxer for each round as well as the average winning margin
while we also calculate the most common reason provided for the boxer who won the given round.
Are you scoring this fight?
Create your in-depth scorecard here
Round-by-round Analysis
Murodjon Akhmadaliev
Marlon Tapales
Akhmadaliev
Round 1
Tapales
9
Round 1
10
Judges average:
9 - 10
(unanimous)
Judges & fans aligned
judge scores
Javier Alvarez
9 - 10
9 - 10
Roberto Torres
9 - 10
9 - 10
Sergio Caiz
9 - 10
9 - 10
Winning Margin Average
Main Reason(s):
Landed cleaner or more effective shots,
Dominated most of round
Akhmadaliev
(9)
Round 2
Tapales
(10)
9
Round 2
10
Judges average:
9 - 10
(unanimous)
Judges & fans aligned
judge scores
Javier Alvarez
9 - 10
9 - 10
Roberto Torres
9 - 10
9 - 10
Sergio Caiz
9 - 10
9 - 10
Winning Margin Average
Main Reason(s):
Landed cleaner or more effective shots
Akhmadaliev
(18)
Round 3
Tapales
(20)
9
Round 3
10
Judges average:
9 - 10
(split)
Judges & fans aligned
judge scores
Javier Alvarez
10 - 9
10 - 9
Roberto Torres
9 - 10
9 - 10
Sergio Caiz
9 - 10
9 - 10
Winning Margin Average
Main Reason(s):
Controlled the action
Akhmadaliev
(27)
Round 4
Tapales
(30)
9
Round 4
10
Judges average:
9 - 10
(split)
Judges & fans aligned
judge scores
Javier Alvarez
10 - 9
10 - 9
Roberto Torres
9 - 10
9 - 10
Sergio Caiz
9 - 10
9 - 10
Winning Margin Average
Main Reason(s):
Landed cleaner or more effective shots
Akhmadaliev
(36)
Round 5
Tapales
(40)
9
Round 5
10
Judges average:
9 - 10
(split)
Judges & fans aligned
judge scores
Javier Alvarez
10 - 9
10 - 9
Roberto Torres
9 - 10
9 - 10
Sergio Caiz
9 - 10
9 - 10
Winning Margin Average
Main Reason(s):
Landed cleaner or more effective shots
Akhmadaliev
(45)
Round 6
Tapales
(50)
9
Round 6
10
Judges average:
9 - 10
(split)
Judges & fans aligned
judge scores
Javier Alvarez
10 - 9
10 - 9
Roberto Torres
9 - 10
9 - 10
Sergio Caiz
9 - 10
9 - 10
Winning Margin Average
Main Reason(s):
Significant punch / combo
Akhmadaliev
(54)
Round 7
Tapales
(60)
10
Round 7
9
Judges average:
10 - 9
(unanimous)
Judges & fans aligned
judge scores
Javier Alvarez
10 - 9
10 - 9
Roberto Torres
10 - 9
10 - 9
Sergio Caiz
10 - 9
10 - 9
Winning Margin Average
Main Reason(s):
Had opponent in trouble
Akhmadaliev
(64)
Round 8
Tapales
(69)
9
Round 8
10
Judges average:
9 - 10
(split)
Judges & fans aligned
judge scores
Javier Alvarez
10 - 9
10 - 9
Roberto Torres
9 - 10
9 - 10
Sergio Caiz
9 - 10
9 - 10
Winning Margin Average
Main Reason(s):
Controlled the action
Akhmadaliev
(73)
Round 9
Tapales
(79)
10
Round 9
9
Judges average:
10 - 9
(unanimous)
Judges & fans aligned
judge scores
Javier Alvarez
10 - 9
10 - 9
Roberto Torres
10 - 9
10 - 9
Sergio Caiz
10 - 9
10 - 9
Winning Margin Average
Main Reason(s):
On the front foot
Akhmadaliev
(83)
Round 10
Tapales
(88)
9
Round 10
10
Judges average:
10 - 9
(unanimous)
Judges & fans differ
judge scores
Javier Alvarez
10 - 9
10 - 9
Roberto Torres
10 - 9
10 - 9
Sergio Caiz
10 - 9
10 - 9
Winning Margin Average
Main Reason(s):
Landed cleaner or more effective shots
Akhmadaliev
(92)
Round 11
Tapales
(98)
10
Round 11
9
Judges average:
10 - 9
(unanimous)
Judges & fans aligned
judge scores
Javier Alvarez
10 - 9
10 - 9
Roberto Torres
10 - 9
10 - 9
Sergio Caiz
10 - 9
10 - 9
Winning Margin Average
Main Reason(s):
Significant punch / combo
Akhmadaliev
(102)
Round 12
Tapales
(107)
10
Round 12
9
Judges average:
10 - 9
(unanimous)
Judges & fans aligned
judge scores
Javier Alvarez
10 - 9
10 - 9
Roberto Torres
10 - 9
10 - 9
Sergio Caiz
10 - 9
10 - 9
Winning Margin Average
Main Reason(s):
Had opponent in trouble
Murodjon Akhmadaliev
TOTALS
Marlon Tapales
112
4 Rounds
VS
116
8 Rounds
Winning Margin Average
Offical Scorecards
Javier Alvarez 110-118 | Roberto Torres 115-113 | Sergio Caiz 115-113
JUDGING ANALYSIS
Javier Alvarez
118 - 110
118 - 110
Roberto Torres
113 - 115
113 - 115
Sergio Caiz
113 - 115
113 - 115
115
Judge Average Totals
113
Unanimous
7
7
%
58.33
58.33
Split
5
5
Judging Analysis
Matched fans
11
11
%
91.67
91.67
Differed from fans
1
1
Judges & fans unanimously agreed on 6 out of 12 rounds (50.00%)