This darkens your screen for night time viewing

Tap click window to close night mode

Live Combined Scorecard

This scorecard comprises all data submitted by our users to generate a combined scorecard.
For this we average out the score for each boxer for each round as well as the average winning margin
while we also calculate the most common reason provided for the boxer who won the given round.

Currently viewing: All users combined average scorecard

Ronald Wright

Fernando Vargas

Wright
Round 1
Vargas
10
Round 1
9
Judges average: 9 - 10 (unanimous)
Judges & fans differ
judge scores
Debra Barnes
9 - 10
David Hess
9 - 10
Jim Howard
9 - 10

Winning Margin Average

58.33% 41.67%
Main Reason(s): Controlled the action
Wright (10)
Round 2
Vargas (9)
10
Round 2
9
Judges average: 10 - 9 (unanimous)
Judges & fans aligned
judge scores
Debra Barnes
10 - 9
David Hess
10 - 9
Jim Howard
10 - 9

Winning Margin Average

61.67% 38.33%
Main Reason(s): Landed cleaner or more effective shots
Wright (20)
Round 3
Vargas (18)
10
Round 3
9
Judges average: 9 - 10 (split)
Judges & fans differ
judge scores
Debra Barnes
9 - 10
David Hess
9 - 10
Jim Howard
10 - 9

Winning Margin Average

51.67% 48.33%
Main Reason(s): More active, Landed cleaner or more effective shots
Wright (30)
Round 4
Vargas (27)
9
Round 4
10
Judges average: 9 - 10 (unanimous)
Judges & fans aligned
judge scores
Debra Barnes
9 - 10
David Hess
9 - 10
Jim Howard
9 - 10

Winning Margin Average

43.33% 56.67%
Main Reason(s): Landed cleaner or more effective shots
Wright (39)
Round 5
Vargas (37)
10
Round 5
9
Judges average: 10 - 9 (split)
Judges & fans aligned
judge scores
Debra Barnes
10 - 9
David Hess
10 - 9
Jim Howard
9 - 10

Winning Margin Average

55.00% 45.00%
Main Reason(s): Controlled the action
Wright (49)
Round 6
Vargas (46)
10
Round 6
9
Judges average: 10 - 9 (split)
Judges & fans aligned
judge scores
Debra Barnes
9 - 10
David Hess
10 - 9
Jim Howard
10 - 9

Winning Margin Average

60.00% 40.00%
Main Reason(s): Landed cleaner or more effective shots
Wright (59)
Round 7
Vargas (55)
10
Round 7
9
Judges average: 9 - 10 (unanimous)
Judges & fans differ
judge scores
Debra Barnes
9 - 10
David Hess
9 - 10
Jim Howard
9 - 10

Winning Margin Average

53.33% 46.67%
Main Reason(s): Landed cleaner or more effective shots
Wright (69)
Round 8
Vargas (64)
10
Round 8
9
Judges average: 10 - 9 (unanimous)
Judges & fans aligned
judge scores
Debra Barnes
10 - 9
David Hess
10 - 9
Jim Howard
10 - 9

Winning Margin Average

60.00% 40.00%
Main Reason(s): Controlled the action
Wright (79)
Round 9
Vargas (73)
9
Round 9
10
Judges average: 9 - 10 (split)
Judges & fans aligned
judge scores
Debra Barnes
10 - 9
David Hess
9 - 10
Jim Howard
9 - 10

Winning Margin Average

48.33% 51.67%
Main Reason(s): Landed cleaner or more effective shots
Wright (88)
Round 10
Vargas (83)
9
Round 10
10
Judges average: 9 - 10 (split)
Judges & fans aligned
judge scores
Debra Barnes
9 - 10
David Hess
10 - 9
Jim Howard
9 - 10

Winning Margin Average

38.33% 61.67%
Main Reason(s): Landed cleaner or more effective shots
Wright (97)
Round 11
Vargas (93)
10
Round 11
9
Judges average: 10 - 9 (split)
Judges & fans aligned
judge scores
Debra Barnes
9 - 10
David Hess
10 - 9
Jim Howard
10 - 9

Winning Margin Average

55.00% 45.00%
Main Reason(s): Controlled the action
Wright (107)
Round 12
Vargas (102)
9
Round 12
10
Judges average: 9 - 10 (unanimous)
Judges & fans aligned
judge scores
Debra Barnes
9 - 10
David Hess
9 - 10
Jim Howard
9 - 10

Winning Margin Average

41.67% 58.33%
Main Reason(s): Landed cleaner or more effective shots

Ronald Wright

TOTALS

Fernando Vargas

116 8 Rounds
VS
112 4 Rounds

Winning Margin Average

52.22% 47.78%

JUDGING ANALYSIS

Debra Barnes
112 - 116
David Hess
114 - 114
Jim Howard
113 - 115
113
Judge Average Totals
115
Unanimous
6
%
50.00
Split
6
Judging Analysis
Matched fans
9
%
75.00
Differed from fans
3
Judges & fans unanimously agreed on 4 out of 12 rounds (33.33%)